• Users Online: 358
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 141-145

The late diagnosis of nerve injuries following interscalene block and shoulder surgery


1 Department of Plastic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth; Department of Hand Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK
2 Department of Hand Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK; Department of General Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
3 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK
4 Department of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK
5 Department of Hand Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Guang H Yim
Department of Plastic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_65_18

Rights and Permissions

Objectives: Interscalene blocks are commonly performed with the shoulder surgery, nerve injuries are reported to have the prevalence of 14% at 10 days postoperatively. While clinicians may be aware of the associated risk of nerve injury from either the surgery or the block, they may not recognize these nerve injuries. Our objectives were to determine factors contributing to injury and late referral. Methods: We searched our peripheral nerve injury database to identify a consecutive series of nerve injuries-associated with interscalene nerve block and the shoulder surgery. The identified cases were subject to clinical review and a review of the medical records including the consent form, anesthetic records, operation note, and the neurophysiology records. Results: Six cases of nerve injury were identified during a 24-month period. Half the patients experienced a delay of >6 months from injury to review, despite the documentation of persisting sensory and motor dysfunction. Regional anesthesia technique was not uniform. All patients required a specialist treatment from a regional peripheral nerve injury service. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware that prolonged block duration is a feature of the potential nerve injury. The presence of a Tinel sign, autonomic dysfunction, and nerve pain in the distribution of the injured nerve are features suggesting nerve injury. Orthopedic surgeons should be able to recognize the nerve injury and seek early referral to the appropriate specialists. Where doubt exists, the patient should be referred for an urgent review by a peripheral nerve injury specialist.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed145    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded23    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal